Dr. Mamta Gautam-Basak
24+ years at the U.S. FDA as an investigator and Lead Chemist for Quality Policy. PhD, IIT Delhi.
Former FDA device reviewers plan and manage your 510(k), De Novo or PMA, so regulatory gaps don't delay your launch.
He evaluated premarket submissions and decided what was sufficient and what wasn't.
Tanmay is a polymer scientist and former lead reviewer at FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). He reviewed premarket device submissions, evaluated materials, biocompatibility and chemical characterization, and helped develop standards including ASTM F3718.
24+ years at the U.S. FDA as an investigator and Lead Chemist for Quality Policy. PhD, IIT Delhi.
Retired FDA research chemist with 70+ publications. Reviewed IDEs, PMAs and 510(k)s for sterility, biocompatibility and toxicology, and helped shape ASTM and AAMI standards.
Chair of Bioengineering at Northeastern University and former NSF program director for Biomaterials.
Toxicologist with nearly four decades at FDA's CDRH, most recently Deputy Director of the Division of Biology, Chemistry, and Materials Science.
These are the gaps that most often stall a 510(k), De Novo or PMA.
Confirm the right pathway, whether 510(k), De Novo or PMA, and plan your testing before you spend on it.
We prepare or review your submission the way an FDA reviewer would, and find the gaps first.
Respond to FDA deficiency letters and prepare for inspections with a former FDA investigator.
Tell us about your device and development stage. We flag the key risks and your likely pathway.
We review your data, documentation and test plans, then set a strategy, timeline and fixed scope.
We prepare your submission, answer FDA's questions and get you inspection-ready, through to FDA's decision.
We've judged device submissions from FDA's side of the table.
Biocompatibility, chemistry and toxicology experts on your team.
Advisors who helped shape the standards you test to.
Medical device companies in India and worldwide, from startups preparing a first 510(k) to established manufacturers answering FDA questions or preparing for inspections.
We discuss your device, stage and goals, then outline your likely pathway and key risks. You leave with clear next steps, whether or not you work with us.
Our advisors have reviewed device submissions, conducted inspections and helped shape FDA standards. So we anticipate FDA's questions and build justifications that hold up.
Yes. Clients often bring us in for biocompatibility, chemical characterization or toxicology, or for an independent reviewer-style check of their submission.
Tell us about your device and development stage. We'll outline your likely pathway and the risks to address first.
contact@tacticityadvisors.com